State Game Refuges, Time for a Change

Many of the State Game Refuges were created to provide sanctuary for deer herds. Today's deer are protected by tag quota regulations not space closure.

Don’t confuse these with the State Wildlife Refuges where hunting programs are in place. They’re a completely different animal.

In 1910, creation of sanctuaries for game animals like deer and bear was a progressive idea. This was an era that preceded game management as we know it today. I made a quick search on the internet, but I couldn’t find the date of creation of the California hunting licence legislation, but I doubt that hunting licenses even existed in 1910  and I’m certain that meaningful game population estimates were non-existent.

Therefore, the concept of creation of big game sanctuaries was a logical human action. The creators of this legislation had no data to rely upon.

Today game is managed by more than gut instincts and it has been known for some time that, with minor exceptions,  game sanctuaries are ineffective as game management tools. In fact, for the most part, that has always been the case.

For detailed information about California State Game Refuges go to: http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/gamerefuges/

Because these refuges were created by legislation, their removal also requires legislative action. If you are interested in participating in the process of determining the fate of these refuges, participate at: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/gamerefuge

If you’re interested in more science on this topic, check out the following article written in 1943. http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/gamerefuges/docs/GameRefuges_1943.pdf

Conclusions are on the last page.

Or, for a briefer statement, check out this article from “Tracks.” http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/gamerefuges/docs/1997Tracks-GameRefuges.pdf

One thought on “State Game Refuges, Time for a Change

  1. I tweeted about this yesterday. I really think that most of those places should be opened up. I truly hope there is a case-by-case set of recommendations for each area. It’s too bad this must go through the leg. process this time, because they are going to be very heavy-handed one way or the other.

    I’ll try to get in on this issue more directly, since I live around here. Frankly, I’d love to get a consulting job defending this proposal (and others like it), because right now I’m an unemployed former advocate/consultant… so if you know anybody, feel free to lead them my way.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s